Gambia vs Guatemala: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Gambia
2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
75th
Guatemala rank
72nd

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Gambia
  • Guatemala
0123196119922023

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Gambia, a difference of 0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Gambia ranks 75th and Guatemala ranks 72nd of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 3 and Guatemala in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5566 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8145 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7569 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.08 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 2.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 2.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.9228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Gambia or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Gambia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Gambia and Guatemala?
0.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Guatemala rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Gambia ranks 75th and Guatemala ranks 72nd of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Guatemala: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/gambia-the/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/gambia-the/guatemala/">Gambia vs Guatemala: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.