France vs New Zealand: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

France
19.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
New Zealand
33.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
France rank
11th
New Zealand rank
9th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • France
  • New Zealand
102030196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 33.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 19.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in France, a difference of 13.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.7 times France's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was France ahead.

France ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 163 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, France averaged higher in 4 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade France New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 15.85 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1970s 18.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 8.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1980s 21.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 11.56 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
1990s 18.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 14.99 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre France
2000s 17.76 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 23.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand
2010s 18.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 31.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), France or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 33.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 19.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in France as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between France and New Zealand?
13.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and New Zealand?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do France and New Zealand rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
France ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 9th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

France vs New Zealand: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/france/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/france/new-zealand/">France vs New Zealand: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.