Eswatini vs Panama: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
0.9817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
91st
Panama rank
90th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Panama
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 91st and Panama ranks 90th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 4 and Panama in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Panama Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5726 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3573 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2153 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.7573 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4326 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.9315 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5723 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3592 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.9608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8404 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.9499 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0567 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2010s 0.9538 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1927 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 0.9327 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1595 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Panama

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Panama?
Panama, at 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.9817 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Panama?
0.0483 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Panama?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Panama rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 91st and Panama ranks 90th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Panama: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/panama/">Eswatini vs Panama: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.