Egypt vs Gambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Egypt
1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
78th
Gambia rank
75th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Egypt
  • Gambia
0123196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 78th and Gambia ranks 75th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Gambia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Gambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1809 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1389 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0421 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 0.2581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.058 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 0.3401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.217 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 0.5123 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 1.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.69 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 1.96 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.06 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Gambia?
Gambia, at 2.13 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Gambia?
0.27 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Gambia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Gambia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Egypt ranks 78th and Gambia ranks 75th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Gambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/gambia-the/">Egypt vs Gambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.