Ecuador vs Finland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
3.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
3.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2017
Ecuador rank
57th
Finland rank
60th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Finland
12345196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 3.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 57 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Ecuador ranks 57th and Finland ranks 60th of 163 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8618 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.16 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1970s 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1980s 1.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 4.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.87 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
1990s 2.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 3.05 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2668 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 3.54 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Finland?
Ecuador, at 3.52 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 3.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Finland?
0.23 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Finland?
57 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2017.
How do Ecuador and Finland rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 57th and Finland ranks 60th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Finland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ecuador/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/ecuador/finland/">Ecuador vs Finland: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.