Congo vs Suriname: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
160th
Suriname rank
159th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Suriname
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 160th and Suriname ranks 159th of 163 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0213 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0204 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0283 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0272 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0028 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0264 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0196 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0158 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0049 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Suriname?
0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Congo and Suriname rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 160th and Suriname ranks 159th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Suriname: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/congo-rep/suriname/">Congo vs Suriname: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.