Comoros vs Rwanda: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Comoros
2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Comoros rank
64th
Rwanda rank
62nd

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Comoros
  • Rwanda
0123196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Comoros, a difference of 0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Comoros ahead.

Comoros ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4459 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3334 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Comoros
1970s 0.6502 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5414 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Comoros
1980s 0.7615 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.26 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4962 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 2.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.48 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Comoros
2000s 2.89 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.18 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Comoros
2010s 3.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.9 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1435 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Comoros
2020s 2.92 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2127 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Comoros or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 3.07 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 2.93 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Comoros as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Comoros and Rwanda?
0.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Comoros and Rwanda rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Comoros ranks 64th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros vs Rwanda: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/comoros/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/comoros/rwanda/">Comoros vs Rwanda: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.