Chad vs Ghana: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad
0.087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ghana
0.0923 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
142nd
Ghana rank
141st

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chad
  • Ghana
0.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.0923 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 142nd and Ghana ranks 141st of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Ghana in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Ghana Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0391 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0313 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0369 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0401 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0523 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0122 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
2000s 0.0468 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0696 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0228 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
2010s 0.0636 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0786 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana
2020s 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0899 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Ghana?
Ghana, at 0.0923 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.087 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Ghana?
0.0053 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Ghana?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Ghana rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chad ranks 142nd and Ghana ranks 141st of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Ghana: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chad/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chad/ghana/">Chad vs Ghana: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.