Canada vs Senegal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Canada
0.4681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Senegal
0.4971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
110th
Senegal rank
107th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Canada
  • Senegal
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Senegal currently reports 0.4971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Senegal's figure about 1.1 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 110th and Senegal ranks 107th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 5 and Senegal in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Senegal Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3879 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1863 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.3597 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1845 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1752 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.3538 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1756 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1782 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.3663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1952 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1711 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.3723 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.235 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
2010s 0.398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0285 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Senegal
2020s 0.4603 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4839 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0236 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Senegal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Senegal?
Senegal, at 0.4971 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Senegal?
0.029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Senegal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Senegal?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Senegal rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 110th and Senegal ranks 107th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Senegal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/canada/senegal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/canada/senegal/">Canada vs Senegal: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.