Cambodia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Cambodia
0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cambodia rank
148th
Namibia rank
147th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Cambodia
  • Namibia
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cambodia, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Namibia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 148th and Namibia ranks 147th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0372 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0487 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
1970s 0.0405 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cambodia
1980s 0.038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0349 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.003 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cambodia
1990s 0.052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0392 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0128 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2000s 0.0598 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0526 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0072 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2010s 0.0599 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0572 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cambodia
2020s 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0547 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0027 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Cambodia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Cambodia or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0574 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Cambodia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Cambodia and Namibia?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cambodia and Namibia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Cambodia ranks 148th and Namibia ranks 147th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/cambodia/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/cambodia/namibia/">Cambodia vs Namibia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.