Benin vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Benin
0.5051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.4767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Benin rank
106th
Zimbabwe rank
109th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Benin
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Benin currently reports 0.5051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Benin ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 163 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2869 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2622 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1970s 0.0356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4298 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3941 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.0512 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4626 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.2391 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4623 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2232 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.3108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.452 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.4126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.443 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0304 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 0.4174 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4602 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0428 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Benin or Zimbabwe?
Benin, at 0.5051 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4767 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Benin and Zimbabwe?
0.0284 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Benin and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Benin ranks 106th and Zimbabwe ranks 109th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benin vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/benin/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/benin/zimbabwe/">Benin vs Zimbabwe: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.