Australia vs Canada: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
0.4581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada
0.4681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
111th
Canada rank
110th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Canada
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.4681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Australia ranks 111th and Canada ranks 110th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Canada in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Canada Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3879 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0084 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.364 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3597 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3538 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0298 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.4456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0793 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.5497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3723 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1774 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.5035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.398 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.4745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4603 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0142 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Canada?
Canada, at 0.4681 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Canada?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Canada rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 111th and Canada ranks 110th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Canada: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/australia/canada/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/australia/canada/">Australia vs Canada: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.