Australia vs Bhutan: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
0.4581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan
0.4782 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
111th
Bhutan rank
108th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Bhutan
0.10.20.30.40.50.6196119922023

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0.4782 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 111th and Bhutan ranks 108th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Bhutan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Bhutan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3795 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1597 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2198 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1970s 0.364 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1980s 0.324 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2492 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0748 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
1990s 0.4456 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2501 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1954 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2000s 0.5497 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2484 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3013 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2010s 0.5035 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4347 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0687 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Australia
2020s 0.4745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5412 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0667 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Bhutan?
Bhutan, at 0.4782 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.4581 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Bhutan?
0.0201 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bhutan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Bhutan rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 111th and Bhutan ranks 108th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Bhutan: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/australia/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/australia/bhutan/">Australia vs Bhutan: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.