Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Afghanistan
1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar
1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Afghanistan rank
87th
Myanmar rank
88th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Afghanistan
  • Myanmar
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Afghanistan currently reports 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Afghanistan ahead.

Afghanistan ranks 87th and Myanmar ranks 88th of 163 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Afghanistan averaged higher in 6 and Myanmar in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Afghanistan Myanmar Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2953 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0819 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2135 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
1970s 0.3457 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1226 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2231 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
1980s 0.3029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2947 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0083 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
1990s 0.6591 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3738 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2000s 0.8792 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.5203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3589 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Afghanistan
2010s 1.09 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.15 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0645 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Myanmar
2020s 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Afghanistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Afghanistan or Myanmar?
Afghanistan, at 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.21 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Afghanistan and Myanmar?
0 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Afghanistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and Myanmar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Afghanistan and Myanmar rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Afghanistan ranks 87th and Myanmar ranks 88th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/afghanistan/myanmar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/afghanistan/myanmar/">Afghanistan vs Myanmar: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,089 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.