Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Congo
0.0003 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0005 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Congo rank
160th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
157th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Congo
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.0010.0020.0030.004196119922024

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.8 times Congo's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 160th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 157th of 163 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0026 1000 Int$ per person 0.0024 1000 Int$ per person Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0028 1000 Int$ per person Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0033 1000 Int$ per person 0.0031 1000 Int$ per person Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0033 1000 Int$ per person 0.0029 1000 Int$ per person Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0025 1000 Int$ per person 0.0021 1000 Int$ per person Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0012 1000 Int$ per person 0.0009 1000 Int$ per person Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person 0.0002 1000 Int$ per person Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Congo or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 0.0005 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0003 1000 Int$ per person in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per person, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Trinidad and Tobago?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Congo ranks 160th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 157th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/congo-rep/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/congo-rep/trinidad-and-tobago/">Congo vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,225 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.