Antigua and Barbuda vs China: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0138 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
China
0.0122 1000 Int$ per person
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
94th
China rank
96th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • China
00.010.020.030.04196119922024

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.0138 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0122 1000 Int$ per person in China, a difference of 0.0016 1000 Int$ per person.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times China's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, Antigua and Barbuda has been ahead every year.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 94th and China ranks 96th of 163 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0187 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0183 1000 Int$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.023 1000 Int$ per person 0.0004 1000 Int$ per person 0.0226 1000 Int$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0385 1000 Int$ per person 0.001 1000 Int$ per person 0.0375 1000 Int$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0366 1000 Int$ per person 0.002 1000 Int$ per person 0.0346 1000 Int$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0303 1000 Int$ per person 0.0071 1000 Int$ per person 0.0233 1000 Int$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.0137 1000 Int$ per person 0.0095 1000 Int$ per person 0.0042 1000 Int$ per person Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0132 1000 Int$ per person 0.0115 1000 Int$ per person 0.0017 1000 Int$ per person Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Antigua and Barbuda or China?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.0138 1000 Int$ per person against 0.0122 1000 Int$ per person in China as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Antigua and Barbuda and China?
0.0016 1000 Int$ per person, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and China?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and China rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 94th and China ranks 96th of 163 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs China: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-capita/antigua-and-barbuda/china/">Antigua and Barbuda vs China: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per capita
Unit
1000 Int$ per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
164 places, 9,225 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.