How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?

12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Croatia vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Croatia

-3.31 % change on previous year

in 2017

Zambia

-3.19 % change on previous year

in 2024

Croatia rank

171st

Zambia rank

170th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Croatia
Zambia

How they compare

Zambia currently reports -3.19 % change on previous year against -3.31 % change on previous year in Croatia, a difference of 0.12 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 171st and Zambia ranks 170th of 200 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Croatia	Zambia	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.3576 % change on previous year	0.936 % change on previous year	0.5783 % change on previous year	Zambia
2010s	-2.48 % change on previous year	-0.1266 % change on previous year	2.36 % change on previous year	Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Croatia or Zambia?: Zambia, at -3.19 % change on previous year against -3.31 % change on previous year in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Croatia and Zambia?: 0.12 % change on previous year, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Zambia?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
How do Croatia and Zambia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Croatia ranks 171st and Zambia ranks 170th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/croatia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/croatia/zambia/">Croatia vs Zambia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 230 places, 12,766 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.