China, Hong Kong SAR vs Uganda: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)
China, Hong Kong SAR
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Uganda
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
124th
Uganda rank
124th
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time
- China, Hong Kong SAR
- Uganda
How they compare
China, Hong Kong SAR currently reports 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Uganda, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Uganda ahead.
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 124th and Uganda ranks 124th of 200 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China, Hong Kong SAR | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.06 % change on previous year | 1.24 % change on previous year | 0.1805 % change on previous year | Uganda |
| 1970s | -5.03 % change on previous year | 5.23 % change on previous year | 10.26 % change on previous year | Uganda |
| 1980s | -6.27 % change on previous year | 0.6368 % change on previous year | 6.9 % change on previous year | Uganda |
| 1990s | -14.47 % change on previous year | 6.47 % change on previous year | 20.94 % change on previous year | Uganda |
| 2000s | -15.87 % change on previous year | 7.84 % change on previous year | 23.72 % change on previous year | Uganda |
| 2010s | 12.73 % change on previous year | 7.8 % change on previous year | 4.93 % change on previous year | China, Hong Kong SAR |
| 2020s | 0 % change on previous year | 6.95 % change on previous year | 6.95 % change on previous year | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China, Hong Kong SAR or Uganda?
- China, Hong Kong SAR, at 0 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in Uganda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda?
- 0 % change on previous year, with China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Uganda rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
- China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 124th and Uganda ranks 124th of 200 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.