China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

China, Hong Kong SAR
0 % change on previous year
in 2024
Ethiopia
0.0412 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
124th
Ethiopia rank
121st

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Ethiopia
-50050100150196219932024

How they compare

Ethiopia currently reports 0.0412 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 0.0412 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 18 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Ethiopia ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 124th and Ethiopia ranks 121st of 200 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 2 and Ethiopia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Ethiopia Difference Ahead
1990s -8.23 % change on previous year 4.31 % change on previous year 12.54 % change on previous year Ethiopia
2000s -15.87 % change on previous year 17.44 % change on previous year 33.31 % change on previous year Ethiopia
2010s 12.73 % change on previous year 3.9 % change on previous year 8.83 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR
2020s 0 % change on previous year -2.04 % change on previous year 2.04 % change on previous year China, Hong Kong SAR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), China, Hong Kong SAR or Ethiopia?
Ethiopia, at 0.0412 % change on previous year against 0 % change on previous year in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia?
0.0412 % change on previous year, with Ethiopia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia?
31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Ethiopia rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 124th and Ethiopia ranks 121st of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/ethiopia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/china-hong-kong-sar/ethiopia/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Ethiopia: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
230 places, 12,766 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.