How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Faroe Islands?

10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chile vs Faroe Islands: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile

3.4 % change on previous year

in 2024

Faroe Islands

3.01 % change on previous year

in 2024

Chile rank

42nd

Faroe Islands rank

45th

Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chile
Faroe Islands

How they compare

Chile currently reports 3.4 % change on previous year against 3.01 % change on previous year in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.39 % change on previous year.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Chile ranks 42nd and Faroe Islands ranks 45th of 200 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Faroe Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chile	Faroe Islands	Difference	Ahead
2010s	0.0618 % change on previous year	0.8507 % change on previous year	0.7889 % change on previous year	Faroe Islands
2020s	0.8672 % change on previous year	-0.8997 % change on previous year	1.77 % change on previous year	Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Faroe Islands?: Chile, at 3.4 % change on previous year against 3.01 % change on previous year in Faroe Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Faroe Islands?: 0.39 % change on previous year, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Faroe Islands?: 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Chile and Faroe Islands rank globally for raw milk of cattle — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chile ranks 42nd and Faroe Islands ranks 45th of 200 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Faroe Islands: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 27 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/chile/faroe-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-milk-of-cattle-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/chile/faroe-islands/">Chile vs Faroe Islands: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit: % change on previous year
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 230 places, 12,766 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

The year-on-year percentage change in Raw milk of cattle — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.