Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square

Malawi
0.0033 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
0.0032 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi rank
107th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
108th

Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square over time

  • Malawi
  • Trinidad and Tobago
00.0020.0040.0060.0080.01196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0033 t per square kilometre against 0.0032 t per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

Malawi ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 108th of 160 countries.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0031 t per square kilometre 0.0026 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0038 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 0.0008 t per square kilometre 0.0039 t per square kilometre 0.0032 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 0.0005 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 0.0012 t per square kilometre 0.0026 t per square kilometre 0.0014 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 0.0021 t per square kilometre 0.0034 t per square kilometre 0.0013 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 0.0029 t per square kilometre 0.003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per square, Malawi or Trinidad and Tobago?
Malawi, at 0.0033 t per square kilometre against 0.0032 t per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per square between Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malawi and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per square?
Malawi ranks 107th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 108th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-sheep-or-lambs-production-per-square-kilometre/malawi/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-sheep-or-lambs-production-per-square-kilometre/malawi/trinidad-and-tobago/">Malawi vs Trinidad and Tobago: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,929 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.