Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square

Antigua and Barbuda
0.0012 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.0012 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
126th
Zimbabwe rank
124th

Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Zimbabwe
00.0050.010.0150.02196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0012 t per square kilometre against 0.0012 t per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0 t per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 126th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 160 countries.

Antigua and Barbuda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0107 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0103 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 0.0149 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0145 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.0184 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0181 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.0135 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0133 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.0085 t per square kilometre 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0084 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.005 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre 0.0041 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.0019 t per square kilometre 0.001 t per square kilometre 0.0009 t per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per square, Antigua and Barbuda or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.0012 t per square kilometre against 0.0012 t per square kilometre in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per square between Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe?
0 t per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per square?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 126th and Zimbabwe ranks 124th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-sheep-or-lambs-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-sheep-or-lambs-production-per-square-kilometre/antigua-and-barbuda/zimbabwe/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Zimbabwe: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
161 places, 8,929 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.