Libya vs Serbia: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita
Libya
0.0009 t per person
in 2024
Serbia
0.0009 t per person
in 2024
Libya rank
22nd
Serbia rank
21st
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita over time
- Libya
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.0009 t per person against 0.0009 t per person in Libya, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 22nd and Serbia ranks 21st of 160 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.001 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | Libya |
| 2020s | 0.0009 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita, Libya or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.0009 t per person against 0.0009 t per person in Libya as of 2024.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita between Libya and Serbia?
- 0 t per person, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Serbia?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Serbia rank globally for raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita?
- Libya ranks 22nd and Serbia ranks 21st of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.