Gabon vs Latvia: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita
Gabon
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0001 t per person
in 2017
Gabon rank
91st
Latvia rank
88th
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita over time
- Gabon
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Gabon, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Gabon ranks 91st and Latvia ranks 88th of 160 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | Gabon |
| 2000s | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Gabon |
| 2010s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita, Gabon or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Gabon as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita between Gabon and Latvia?
- 0 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Gabon and Latvia rank globally for raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita?
- Gabon ranks 91st and Latvia ranks 88th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.