Belgium vs Gabon: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita
Belgium
0.0001 t per person
in 2017
Gabon
0.0001 t per person
in 2024
Belgium rank
90th
Gabon rank
91st
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita over time
- Belgium
- Gabon
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Gabon, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 90th and Gabon ranks 91st of 160 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | Gabon |
| 2010s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita, Belgium or Gabon?
- Belgium, at 0.0001 t per person against 0.0001 t per person in Gabon as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita between Belgium and Gabon?
- 0 t per person, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Gabon?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Belgium and Gabon rank globally for raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — production, per capita?
- Belgium ranks 90th and Gabon ranks 91st of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.