Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Raw hides and skins: Producing … Raw annual growth rate

Congo
0.5249 % change on previous year
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
0.4198 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo rank
68th
Papua New Guinea rank
71st

Raw hides and skins: Producing … Raw annual growth rate over time

  • Congo
  • Papua New Guinea
02505007501.0k196219932024

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.5249 % change on previous year against 0.4198 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.1051 % change on previous year.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 22 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 68th and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 193 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s -1.65 % change on previous year 12.71 % change on previous year 14.36 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
1970s 5.02 % change on previous year 163.65 % change on previous year 158.63 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
1980s 11.14 % change on previous year 9.54 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year Congo
1990s 0.4716 % change on previous year 7.52 % change on previous year 7.05 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2000s 1.18 % change on previous year 1.41 % change on previous year 0.2366 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2010s 0.859 % change on previous year 1.69 % change on previous year 0.8289 % change on previous year Papua New Guinea
2020s 0.5198 % change on previous year 0.3854 % change on previous year 0.1343 % change on previous year Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — producing, Congo or Papua New Guinea?
Congo, at 0.5249 % change on previous year against 0.4198 % change on previous year in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — producing between Congo and Papua New Guinea?
0.1051 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Congo and Papua New Guinea rank globally for raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — producing?
Congo ranks 68th and Papua New Guinea ranks 71st of 193 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-sheep-or-lambs-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-sheep-or-lambs-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual-growth-rate/congo-rep/papua-new-guinea/">Congo vs Papua New Guinea: Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
224 places, 12,626 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Raw hides and skins of sheep or lambs — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.