Equatorial Guinea vs Guatemala: Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per square

Equatorial Guinea
0.0004 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala
0.0003 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
125th
Guatemala rank
128th

Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Guatemala
000.001196119922023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0.0004 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 0.0001 t per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.5 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guatemala ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th and Guatemala ranks 128th of 146 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Guatemala in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0001 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Guatemala
1970s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0006 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre Guatemala
1980s 0.0002 t per square kilometre 0.0007 t per square kilometre 0.0005 t per square kilometre Guatemala
1990s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Guatemala
2000s 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Guatemala
2010s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0004 t per square kilometre 0.0003 t per square kilometre 0.0001 t per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per square, Equatorial Guinea or Guatemala?
Equatorial Guinea, at 0.0004 t per square kilometre against 0.0003 t per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per square between Equatorial Guinea and Guatemala?
0.0001 t per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Guatemala rank globally for raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 125th and Guatemala ranks 128th of 146 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Guatemala: Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-goats-or-kids-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-goats-or-kids-production-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/guatemala/">Equatorial Guinea vs Guatemala: Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
147 places, 8,382 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.