Malaysia vs Slovenia: Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per capita
Malaysia
0 t per person
in 2024
Slovenia
0 t per person
in 2017
Malaysia rank
101st
Slovenia rank
98th
Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per capita over time
- Malaysia
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Malaysia, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 101st and Slovenia ranks 98th of 146 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per capita, Malaysia or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Malaysia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per capita between Malaysia and Slovenia?
- 0 t per person, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Malaysia and Slovenia rank globally for raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per capita?
- Malaysia ranks 101st and Slovenia ranks 98th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.