Hungary vs Suriname: Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per capita
Hungary
0 t per person
in 2017
Suriname
0 t per person
in 2024
Hungary rank
126th
Suriname rank
129th
Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per capita over time
- Hungary
- Suriname
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Suriname, a difference of 0 t per person.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.7 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Suriname ahead.
Hungary ranks 126th and Suriname ranks 129th of 146 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Suriname |
| 2000s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Suriname |
| 2010s | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | 0 t per person | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per capita, Hungary or Suriname?
- Hungary, at 0 t per person against 0 t per person in Suriname as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per capita between Hungary and Suriname?
- 0 t per person, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Suriname?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2017.
- How do Hungary and Suriname rank globally for raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, per capita?
- Hungary ranks 126th and Suriname ranks 129th of 146 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.