China, Macao SAR vs Tonga: Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, annual growth rate

China, Macao SAR
1.14 % change on previous year
in 2024
Tonga
1.02 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Macao SAR rank
61st
Tonga rank
63rd

Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, annual growth rate over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Tonga
-2000200400600800196219932024

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports 1.14 % change on previous year against 1.02 % change on previous year in Tonga, a difference of 0.12 % change on previous year.

That makes China, Macao SAR's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.

The two have swapped places 25 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Tonga ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 61st and Tonga ranks 63rd of 182 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 3 and Tonga in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Tonga Difference Ahead
1960s -10.45 % change on previous year 6.36 % change on previous year 16.81 % change on previous year Tonga
1970s 78.41 % change on previous year 13.23 % change on previous year 65.17 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1980s -35.47 % change on previous year -0.1651 % change on previous year 35.31 % change on previous year Tonga
1990s 79.17 % change on previous year -0.1379 % change on previous year 79.3 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2000s -0.9438 % change on previous year 0.5894 % change on previous year 1.53 % change on previous year Tonga
2010s 2.24 % change on previous year 0.5455 % change on previous year 1.7 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
2020s 0.3143 % change on previous year 1.17 % change on previous year 0.8572 % change on previous year Tonga

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, annual growth rate, China, Macao SAR or Tonga?
China, Macao SAR, at 1.14 % change on previous year against 1.02 % change on previous year in Tonga as of 2024.
What is the difference in raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, annual growth rate between China, Macao SAR and Tonga?
0.12 % change on previous year, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Tonga?
54 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do China, Macao SAR and Tonga rank globally for raw hides and skins of goats or kids — production, annual growth rate?
China, Macao SAR ranks 61st and Tonga ranks 63rd of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Tonga: Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-goats-or-kids-production-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/tonga/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-hides-and-skins-of-goats-or-kids-production-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/tonga/">China, Macao SAR vs Tonga: Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
213 places, 12,075 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Raw hides and skins of goats or kids — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.