Lithuania vs Serbia: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP
Lithuania
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Serbia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lithuania rank
78th
Serbia rank
76th
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Lithuania
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Lithuania ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 76th of 166 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per unit of gdp, Lithuania or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per unit of gdp between Lithuania and Serbia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per unit of gdp?
- Lithuania ranks 78th and Serbia ranks 76th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.