Austria vs Latvia: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP
Austria
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2017
Austria rank
101st
Latvia rank
99th
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP over time
- Austria
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Austria, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Austria's.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Austria ranks 101st and Latvia ranks 99th of 166 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per unit of gdp, Austria or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Austria as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per unit of gdp between Austria and Latvia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Latvia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2017.
- How do Austria and Latvia rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per unit of gdp?
- Austria ranks 101st and Latvia ranks 99th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.