Panama vs South Sudan: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Panama
0.002 t per person
in 2024
South Sudan
0.0021 t per person
in 2024
Panama rank
34th
South Sudan rank
31st
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Panama
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 0.0021 t per person against 0.002 t per person in Panama, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 34th and South Sudan ranks 31st of 167 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0022 t per person | 0.0024 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0022 t per person | 0.0023 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Panama or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 0.0021 t per person against 0.002 t per person in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Panama and South Sudan?
- 0.0001 t per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and South Sudan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do Panama and South Sudan rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Panama ranks 34th and South Sudan ranks 31st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.