Nepal vs Qatar: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Nepal
0.0001 t per person
in 1990
Qatar
0 t per person
in 2024
Nepal rank
159th
Qatar rank
161st
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Nepal
- Qatar
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.0001 t per person against 0 t per person in Qatar, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Qatar's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.
Nepal ranks 159th and Qatar ranks 161st of 167 countries.
Qatar has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0003 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Qatar |
| 1970s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Qatar |
| 1980s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | Qatar |
| 1990s | 0.0001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | 0 t per person | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Nepal or Qatar?
- Nepal, at 0.0001 t per person against 0 t per person in Qatar as of 1990.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Nepal and Qatar?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Qatar?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1990.
- How do Nepal and Qatar rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Nepal ranks 159th and Qatar ranks 161st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.