Luxembourg vs Zambia: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Luxembourg
0.0015 t per person
in 2017
Zambia
0.0014 t per person
in 2024
Luxembourg rank
48th
Zambia rank
51st
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Luxembourg
- Zambia
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 0.0015 t per person against 0.0014 t per person in Zambia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 51st of 167 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.002 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0.0015 t per person | 0.0015 t per person | 0 t per person | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Luxembourg or Zambia?
- Luxembourg, at 0.0015 t per person against 0.0014 t per person in Zambia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Luxembourg and Zambia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Zambia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
- How do Luxembourg and Zambia rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Luxembourg ranks 48th and Zambia ranks 51st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.