Latvia vs Romania: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Latvia
0.0011 t per person
in 2017
Romania
0.0012 t per person
in 2017
Latvia rank
61st
Romania rank
59th
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 0.0012 t per person against 0.0011 t per person in Latvia, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 61st and Romania ranks 59th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Romania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0025 t per person | 0.0018 t per person | 0.0006 t per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.001 t per person | 0.0016 t per person | 0.0005 t per person | Romania |
| 2010s | 0.001 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Latvia or Romania?
- Romania, at 0.0012 t per person against 0.0011 t per person in Latvia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Latvia and Romania?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 61st and Romania ranks 59th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.