Latvia vs Morocco: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Latvia
0.0011 t per person
in 2017
Morocco
0.001 t per person
in 2024
Latvia rank
61st
Morocco rank
63rd
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Latvia
- Morocco
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0011 t per person against 0.001 t per person in Morocco, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 61st and Morocco ranks 63rd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Morocco in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Morocco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0025 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0017 t per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.001 t per person | 0.0008 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0.001 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Morocco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Latvia or Morocco?
- Latvia, at 0.0011 t per person against 0.001 t per person in Morocco as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Latvia and Morocco?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Morocco?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Latvia and Morocco rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Latvia ranks 61st and Morocco ranks 63rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.