Djibouti vs Latvia: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Djibouti
0.001 t per person
in 2024
Latvia
0.0011 t per person
in 2017
Djibouti rank
64th
Latvia rank
61st
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Djibouti
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0.0011 t per person against 0.001 t per person in Djibouti, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Djibouti ranks 64th and Latvia ranks 61st of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.001 t per person | 0.0025 t per person | 0.0015 t per person | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0.0012 t per person | 0.001 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 0.0011 t per person | 0.001 t per person | 0.0001 t per person | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Djibouti or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 0.0011 t per person against 0.001 t per person in Djibouti as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Djibouti and Latvia?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Djibouti and Latvia rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Djibouti ranks 64th and Latvia ranks 61st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.