Denmark vs Kazakhstan: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Denmark
0.0026 t per person
in 2017
Kazakhstan
0.0027 t per person
in 2024
Denmark rank
21st
Kazakhstan rank
20th
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Denmark
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.0027 t per person against 0.0026 t per person in Denmark, a difference of 0.0001 t per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 21st and Kazakhstan ranks 20th of 167 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0043 t per person | 0.0039 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Denmark |
| 2000s | 0.0032 t per person | 0.0027 t per person | 0.0004 t per person | Denmark |
| 2010s | 0.0028 t per person | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Denmark or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.0027 t per person against 0.0026 t per person in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Denmark and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0001 t per person, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Kazakhstan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2017.
- How do Denmark and Kazakhstan rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Denmark ranks 21st and Kazakhstan ranks 20th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.