Czechia vs Portugal: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Czechia
0.0009 t per person
in 2017
Portugal
0.0009 t per person
in 2017
Czechia rank
71st
Portugal rank
68th
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Czechia
- Portugal
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 0.0009 t per person against 0.0009 t per person in Czechia, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 71st and Portugal ranks 68th of 167 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0023 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0012 t per person | Czechia |
| 2000s | 0.0013 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.0002 t per person | Czechia |
| 2010s | 0.001 t per person | 0.0009 t per person | 0 t per person | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Czechia or Portugal?
- Portugal, at 0.0009 t per person against 0.0009 t per person in Czechia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Czechia and Portugal?
- 0 t per person, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Portugal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2017.
- How do Czechia and Portugal rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Czechia ranks 71st and Portugal ranks 68th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.