Chile vs Montenegro: Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita
Chile
0.0015 t per person
in 2024
Montenegro
0.0015 t per person
in 2024
Chile rank
49th
Montenegro rank
47th
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita over time
- Chile
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 0.0015 t per person against 0.0015 t per person in Chile, a difference of 0 t per person.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 49th and Montenegro ranks 47th of 167 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0021 t per person | 0.0011 t per person | 0.001 t per person | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.0017 t per person | 0.001 t per person | 0.0007 t per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.0015 t per person | 0.0015 t per person | 0 t per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita, Chile or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 0.0015 t per person against 0.0015 t per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita between Chile and Montenegro?
- 0 t per person, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for raw hides and skins of cattle — production, per capita?
- Chile ranks 49th and Montenegro ranks 47th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw hides and skins of cattle — Production divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.