Argentina vs Botswana: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Revealed comparative
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Revealed comparative over time
- Argentina
- Botswana
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.17 against 0.12 in Argentina, a difference of 0.05.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.4 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 45th and Botswana ranks 43rd of 133 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Botswana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.138 | 0.154 | 0.016 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 0.08 | 0.44 | 0.36 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — revealed comparative, Argentina or Botswana?
- Botswana, at 0.17 against 0.12 in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — revealed comparative between Argentina and Botswana?
- 0.05, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Botswana?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Botswana rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — revealed comparative?
- Argentina ranks 45th and Botswana ranks 43rd of 133 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Revealed comparative advantage index. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The food and agricultural trade indicators dataset is based on trade, production and gross domestic product (GDP) data. Agri-food trade data are collected, processed and disseminated by FAO according to the standard International Merchandise Trade Statistics (IMTS) Methodology. The data is mainly provided by UNSD, Eurostat, and other national authorities as needed. The source data is checked for outliers, trade partner data is used for non-reporting countries or missing cells, and data on food aid is added to take total cross-border trade flows into account. The trade database includes the following variables: export quantity, export value, import quantity, and import value. It includes all food and agricultural products imported/exported annually by all countries in the world. Production data details are available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QCL and GDP data details are available at https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/MK