Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Sudan rank
16th
Zimbabwe rank
15th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Sudan ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 124 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of?
- Sudan ranks 16th and Zimbabwe ranks 15th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.