Latvia vs Nepal: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2006
Nepal
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia rank
44th
Nepal rank
47th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of over time
- Latvia
- Nepal
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Nepal, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 44th and Nepal ranks 47th of 124 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of, Latvia or Nepal?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Nepal as of 2006.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of between Latvia and Nepal?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Nepal?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2006.
- How do Latvia and Nepal rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of?
- Latvia ranks 44th and Nepal ranks 47th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.