Latvia vs Mexico: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2006
Mexico
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia rank
44th
Mexico rank
45th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of over time
- Latvia
- Mexico
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Mexico, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mexico ahead.
Latvia ranks 44th and Mexico ranks 45th of 124 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Mexico |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of, Latvia or Mexico?
- Latvia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Mexico as of 2006.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of between Latvia and Mexico?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Mexico?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2006.
- How do Latvia and Mexico rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of?
- Latvia ranks 44th and Mexico ranks 45th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.