Georgia vs Portugal: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of
Georgia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2009
Portugal
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Georgia rank
111th
Portugal rank
111th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of over time
- Georgia
- Portugal
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Portugal, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 111th and Portugal ranks 111th of 124 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Georgia |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Portugal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of, Georgia or Portugal?
- Georgia, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Portugal as of 2009.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of between Georgia and Portugal?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Portugal?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2009.
- How do Georgia and Portugal rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of?
- Georgia ranks 111th and Portugal ranks 111th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.