Ecuador vs Latvia: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of
Ecuador
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Latvia
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2006
Ecuador rank
41st
Latvia rank
44th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 41st and Latvia ranks 44th of 124 countries.
Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of, Ecuador or Latvia?
- Ecuador, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2006.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of?
- Ecuador ranks 41st and Latvia ranks 44th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.