Cuba vs Sudan: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of
Cuba
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Sudan
0 t per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Cuba rank
18th
Sudan rank
16th
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of over time
- Cuba
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Cuba, a difference of 0 t per US$ of GDP.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 18th and Sudan ranks 16th of 124 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | 0 t per US$ of GDP | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of, Cuba or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 0 t per US$ of GDP against 0 t per US$ of GDP in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of between Cuba and Sudan?
- 0 t per US$ of GDP, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Cuba and Sudan rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per unit of?
- Cuba ranks 18th and Sudan ranks 16th of 124 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.