Egypt vs Mexico: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square

Egypt
2.86 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Mexico
2.87 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
35th
Mexico rank
34th

Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square over time

  • Egypt
  • Mexico
01234196119922023

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 2.87 t per square kilometre against 2.86 t per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.01 t per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Egypt ranks 35th and Mexico ranks 34th of 124 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3783 t per square kilometre 1.03 t per square kilometre 0.6562 t per square kilometre Mexico
1970s 0.6224 t per square kilometre 1.41 t per square kilometre 0.7835 t per square kilometre Mexico
1980s 0.8508 t per square kilometre 1.69 t per square kilometre 0.8374 t per square kilometre Mexico
1990s 1.16 t per square kilometre 2.19 t per square kilometre 1.03 t per square kilometre Mexico
2000s 1.64 t per square kilometre 2.78 t per square kilometre 1.14 t per square kilometre Mexico
2010s 2.31 t per square kilometre 3.14 t per square kilometre 0.8302 t per square kilometre Mexico
2020s 2.59 t per square kilometre 3.19 t per square kilometre 0.605 t per square kilometre Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square, Egypt or Mexico?
Mexico, at 2.87 t per square kilometre against 2.86 t per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square between Egypt and Mexico?
0.01 t per square kilometre, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Mexico rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square?
Egypt ranks 35th and Mexico ranks 34th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Mexico: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-cane-or-beet-sugar-centrifugal-only-production-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-cane-or-beet-sugar-centrifugal-only-production-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/mexico/">Egypt vs Mexico: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.