Cuba vs Egypt: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square

Cuba
2.88 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt
2.86 t per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
33rd
Egypt rank
35th

Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Egypt
020406080196119922023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 2.88 t per square kilometre against 2.86 t per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 0.02 t per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.

Cuba ranks 33rd and Egypt ranks 35th of 124 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Egypt Difference Ahead
1960s 48.63 t per square kilometre 0.3783 t per square kilometre 48.25 t per square kilometre Cuba
1970s 60.33 t per square kilometre 0.6224 t per square kilometre 59.71 t per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 71.04 t per square kilometre 0.8508 t per square kilometre 70.19 t per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 46.8 t per square kilometre 1.16 t per square kilometre 45.65 t per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 20.75 t per square kilometre 1.64 t per square kilometre 19.11 t per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 13.8 t per square kilometre 2.31 t per square kilometre 11.5 t per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 6.42 t per square kilometre 2.59 t per square kilometre 3.83 t per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square, Cuba or Egypt?
Cuba, at 2.88 t per square kilometre against 2.86 t per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square between Cuba and Egypt?
0.02 t per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Egypt?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Egypt rank globally for raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — production, per square?
Cuba ranks 33rd and Egypt ranks 35th of 124 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Egypt: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-cane-or-beet-sugar-centrifugal-only-production-per-square-kilometre/cuba/egypt-arab-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/raw-cane-or-beet-sugar-centrifugal-only-production-per-square-kilometre/cuba/egypt-arab-rep/">Cuba vs Egypt: Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production, per square kilometre
Unit
t per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
125 places, 6,773 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Raw cane or beet sugar (centrifugal only) — Production divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.